Investigation the Relationship Between Spin Deformity and Foot Plantar Pressure
Abstract
Plantar decompression is the area of pressure that acts between the foot and the foot
Support surface during daily motor activities. Information derived from ex. Manometers are important in gait and posture research for lower extremity diagnosis Problems, and this paper reviews the properties of plantar foot sensors as reported in the literature on In addition to the plantar pressure measurement systems applied to a variety of research problems.
The strengths and limitations of current and older wireless systems are discussed A suitable plantar pressure system was proposed to measure the high-pressure distributions and to know the deformation of the spine through measurements of some angles of the body through the plantar pressure under the foot with high accuracy and reliability. The new system is based on high linear pressure sensors without deceleration. The results were three parts. The first part is a photographic analysis of the system, the second part is the results of the plantar pressure, and the third is a comparison between the results to show the effect of the position deviation on the plantar pressure of both the left foot and the right foot
References
Yan, S.H.; Zhang, K.; Tan, G.Q.; Liu, Z.C. Effects of obesity on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in Chinese prepubescent children during walking. Gait Posture 2013, 37, 37–42. [CrossRef]
Park, S.-Y.; Park, D.-J. Comparison of Foot Structure, Function, Plantar Pressure and Balance Ability According to the Body Mass Index of Young
Adults. Osong Public Heal. Res. Perspect. 2019, 10, 102–107. [CrossRef]
Ripani, M.; Ciccarelli, A.; Morini, S.; Ricciardi, G.; Michielon, G.
Evaluation of foot support in rugby players: A baropo-dometric analysis.
Sport Sci. Health 2006, 1, 104–108. [CrossRef]
Baumfeld, T.; Rezende, R.F.; Nery, C.; Batista, J.P.; Baumfeld, D. Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Professional Soccer Players: Case Series. Foot Ankle Spéc. 2020, 14, 213–218. [CrossRef]
Girard, O.; Millet, G.P.; Thomson, A.; Brocherie, F. Is plantar loading altered during repeated sprints on artificial turf in in-ternational? J. Sports Sci. Med. 2018, 17, 359–365 .
Porter, D.A.; Klott, J. Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes:
Management of acute and chronic conditions. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021 ,26 ,
.63– 35[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stone, J.A.; Miranda, A.D.; Gerhardt, M.B.; Mandelbaum, B.R.; Giza, E. Outcomes of surgically treated fifth metatarsal frac-tures in major league soccer athletes. Am. J. Sports Med. 2021, 49, 3014–3020. [CrossRef]
Hunt, K.J.; Goeb, Y.; Bartolomei, J. Dynamic Loading Assessment at the
Fifth Metatarsal in Elite Athletes With a History of Jones Fracture. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2020, 31, e321–e326. [CrossRef]
Lewson, E.B.; Pulsifer, M.S.E.; Mallette, J.P. Cuboid sling: A novel surgical repair of cuboid syndrome and literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. Tech. Rep. Cases 2021, 1. [CrossRef]
Lavery, L.; Vela, S.; Fleishli, J.; Armstrong, D.; Lavery, D. Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot. Diabetes Care 1997, 20, 1706–1710.
Mueller, M. Application of plantar pressure assessment in footwear and insert design. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1999, 29, 747–755.
Praet, S.; Louwerens, J. The influence of shoe design on plantar pressures in neuropathic feet. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 441–445.
Queen, R.M.; Abbey, A.N.; Wiegerinck, J.I.; Yoder, J.C.; Nunley, J.A. Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: A gender comparison. Gait Posture 2010, 31, 18–22.
CDC. Diabetes Public Health Resource. Diabetes DDT. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/ diabetes/ (accessed on 1 January 2012).
Wild, S.; Roglic, G.; Green, A.; Sicree, R.; King, H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 1047–1053.
Gioftsidou, A.; Malliou, P.; Pafis, G.; Beneka, A.; Godolias, G.; Maganaris, C. The effects of soccer training and timing of balance training on balance ability. Eur. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 96,
659–664
Queen, R.; Haynes, B.; Hardaker, W.; Garrett, W. Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007, 35, 630–636.
Bell, A.L., Pedersen, D.R., Brand, R.A., 1990. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J. Biomech. 23 (6), 617e621.
Berthonnaud, E., Dimnet, J., Hilmi, R., 2009. Classification of pelvic and spinal postural patterns in upright position. Specific cases of scoliotic patients. Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 33 (8), 634e643.
. James, H., Castaneda, L., Miller, M.E., Findley, T., 2009. Rolfing structural integration treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. J. Bodywork Move. Ther. 13 (3), 229e238.
Rosa´rio, J.L.P., Nakashima, I.Y., Rizopoulos, K., Kostopoulos, D., Marques, A.P., 2012. Improving posture: comparing segmental stretch and muscular chains therapy. Clin. Chiropractic. (in press). Tekscan. Tactile Pressure Measurement,
Suzuki, H., Endo, K., Mizuochi, J., Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, H., Yamamoto, K., 2010. Clasped position for measurement of sagittal spinal alignment. Eur. Spine J. 19, 782e786.
Viguier, M., Dupui, P., Montoya, R., 2009. Posture analysis on young women before and after 60 days of 6 degrees head down bed rest (Wise 2005). Gait Posture 29 (2), 188e193.
Bonde-Petersen, F., 1975. A simple force platform. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 34
(1), 51e54.
Nashner, L.M., 1972. Vestibular postural control model. Kybernetik 10, 106e110.